I
attended this conference over the Easter weekend in Melbourne, Australia.
Around 1140 people attended the conference. This makes it the largest Marxist conference to be held in Australasia
since the 1970s. Here are a few of my reflections on the conference.
• On an
international scale the anti-Stalinist Marxist intellectual tradition has been
undergoing a major revival since the Seattle protests at the end of 1999 shut
down the millienium round of the WTO and sparked the global justice/anti-capitalist
movement that fed into the anti-war movement of the early 2000s.
The
impressive size of Marxism 2013 in Melbourne is in small part due to this wider
international shift to the left of the intellectual cultures of the advanced
capitalist societies, but mainly a result of the sustained effort and success
of Socialist Alternative (SA), which is the largest socialist group in
Australia and the sister organisation of the ISO in Aotearoa, in building this
conference over a number of years.
• This
has become a truly inspiring event for those of us who think that there are
some pretty major problems with global capitalism, and that it is important to
consider how we might collectively create a socialist world that is more
democratic, egalitarian, libertarian, and environmentally sustainable. The
sessions which featured John Pilger, Black Panther Billy Jenkins, Aboriginal
activist Gary Foley, and US socialist Brian Jones were especially stimulating
and energizing.
A sample
of the featured speakers is provided at:
See, for
example, Brian Jones: The hypocrisy of US capitalism today
Gary
Foley speaks @ Marxism 2012 (Excerpt)
But as
there were six streams running concurrently there were many other topics and sessions
to chose from. A link to the final programme is below.
• Videos from
Marxism 2013 will be uploaded to the following site. At present videos of talks
from the 2012 conference are available at: http://www.youtube.com/user/marxismconference/videos?view=0
• Several
people commented to me that the conference had developed into much more than a
‘party conference’. Although SA built and hosted the conference, it was
supported by Socialist Alliance and most of the other socialist groups in
Australia, and the discussions made it clear that there were people from a wide
range of left organisations and perspectives.
• The
intellectual level of the talks and discussion was much higher than I’ve come
to expect from attending academic conferences. At most academic conferences you
get to speak for 15-20 minutes with around 10 minutes of discussion. At Marxism
speakers spoke for around 40 minutes, following by 45 minutes of questions,
discussion and debate, and then the speaker had five minutes to sum up and
reply to the questions and criticisms. This meant that you came away from each
session having learned a lot about the topic.
• It was
great to see the School of Rebellion being run at the conference for the kids,
both so they learnt something, and also to help ensure that their parents could
make it to the sessions. Brian Jones, one of the keynote speakers from the US,
spent aound two hours with the kids. They painted placards and a banner and at
various points rebelled against their teachers!
• The one concern that I had about the conference was that there
needed to be a session focused on the racist Northern Territory Intervention,
now called the Stronger Futures Policy (meaning more appallingly racist policy
from the Australian federal government whether Labor or Liberal), and more than
one session on indigenous politics and resistance to racism. For example, I
would have liked a discussion focusing on resistance to the NT intervention and
then in a different session a panel discussion of the state of aboriginal people
and their resistance to racism in the various states.
• This was a very youthful conference. My rough estimate would be that at least 70% of those who attended are under 30. The older generation (over 50) would have made up not much more than 2-3% of those attending. In addition, the gender balance of those attending the conference was close to 50/50 male and female. The leadership of SA is, to a greater extent than any other socialist organisation that I have encountered, both young and female. SA has produced an Anti-Sexism Manifesto for socialist men, and clearly has created an internal culture that encourages women to participate fully at all levels of the organisation. There were undergraduate and postgraduate students from virtually every major city in Australia and New Zealand (Christchurch being the only notable exception). All of this bodes well for the future of Marxism.
• Just in case it wasn't obvious already, this conference confirmed that in the West and Australasia, Stalinism is dead. Virtually everyone at the conference, with the possible exception of a few anarchists, recognises that the Stalinist dictatorships in Eastern Europe and Asia were socially, economically and politically inconsistent with the classical Marxist vision of a socialism that is more rather than less democratic than the limited form of democracy that exists in the liberal democracies governing advanced capitalist societies. As this indicates, this was a conference that stands on the intellectual and political foundations of the Trotskyist tradition.
• This was a very youthful conference. My rough estimate would be that at least 70% of those who attended are under 30. The older generation (over 50) would have made up not much more than 2-3% of those attending. In addition, the gender balance of those attending the conference was close to 50/50 male and female. The leadership of SA is, to a greater extent than any other socialist organisation that I have encountered, both young and female. SA has produced an Anti-Sexism Manifesto for socialist men, and clearly has created an internal culture that encourages women to participate fully at all levels of the organisation. There were undergraduate and postgraduate students from virtually every major city in Australia and New Zealand (Christchurch being the only notable exception). All of this bodes well for the future of Marxism.
• Just in case it wasn't obvious already, this conference confirmed that in the West and Australasia, Stalinism is dead. Virtually everyone at the conference, with the possible exception of a few anarchists, recognises that the Stalinist dictatorships in Eastern Europe and Asia were socially, economically and politically inconsistent with the classical Marxist vision of a socialism that is more rather than less democratic than the limited form of democracy that exists in the liberal democracies governing advanced capitalist societies. As this indicates, this was a conference that stands on the intellectual and political foundations of the Trotskyist tradition.
• I came
away from this conference feeling incrediably inspired and energized. In
Aotearoa the International Socialist Organization is much smaller than
Socialist Alternative in Australia, but it is grounded in the same intellectual
tradition and shares the same broad political programme. Joining can not only
help you to develop a stronger intellectual understanding of the world, it can
provide a means for you to become involved in the struggle to change it. For
more information follow the link below:
Correction: Socialist Alternative is not the largest socialist group in Australia, the Socialist Alliance is. Socialist Alternative is larger than SA in some centres (eg: Melbourne) but does not have the Alliance's geographical spread.
ReplyDeleteWhile the conference was organised and run by Socialist Alternative -- support and promotion also came from, as the article below makes clear, the Socialist Alliance and Green Left Weekly . This support was agreed to as part of the unity process being discussed between the two organisations.
Socialist Alternative's report on the conference is here:
http://sa.org.au/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=7699%3Amarxism-2013-conference-the-biggest-to-date&Itemid=393
My understanding is that Socialist Alliance is larger in terms of its paper membership but not active membership- although I don't want to get into this kind of debate because I am not in a position to provide a rigorous empirical assessment of the relative size of the two groups. Besides which this seems to me beside the point. I did acknowledge, but perhaps needed to put more emphasis on this point, that Socialst Alliance supported and helped to build the conference. Thanks for posting the link to SA's report. My view of the unity process is that it is a healthy development for the socialist left in Australia. I really enjoyed the input of the Socialist Alliance comrades in the session on Venezuela- provided a lot of detail and depth that would have otherwise been missing from the discussion.
DeleteThanks very much for your large information .And knowledge full description . I think it is Sus a topic that many kinds of people face many problems. thanks for this. seo Melbourne
ReplyDelete